Players ludo92290 [CHPF]    
293
461

WG player page
Updated: February 24, 2018 Update
Battles 13,547 807 90
WN8
293
461
573
Win Rate 45.21% 45.23% 46.68%
WG Rating 2,423
Forum Signature Account Created: March 09, 2013 @ 10:10 pm   |   Last Battle: February 24, 2018 @ 4:43 pm
 Clans History:
 Nick History:
 ludo92290 
  

Graphs



  
Tier Damage Winrate Battles
10 0 0% 0 00000
9 555.78 37.78% 45 450000
8 417.41 41.00% 817 618199000
7 348.45 43.63% 1,978 1,011817109041
6 284.93 44.31% 2,284 1,4054932740112
5 261.20 46.81% 3,324 1,28896331619423
4 164.92 45.20% 3,029 1853011,212729602
3 89.33 47.62% 1,430 28262778193169
2 72.38 45.87% 569 0133385429
1 50.08 43.66% 71 0264500
Stats Total Avg
Tanks 78
Battles: 13,547
Survival: 3,494 25.79%
XP: 3,221,252 237.78
Total Damage: 3,246,307 239.63
Total Frags: 5,382 0.40
Total Shots: 98,371 7.26
Damage Received: 6,976,217 514.96
Capture Points: 18,009 1.33
Defence Points: 6,162 0.45

Players Tanks: 78 All Tanks   |   Recent Tanks
9
45 (22.22%)
556
0.38
0.53
n/a
37.78%
8
193 (17.62%)
408
0.26
0.53
39.90%
8
425 (23.76%)
452
0.27
0.49
41.65%
8
199 (25.13%)
352
0.23
0.42
40.70%
7
394 (26.40%)
412
0.36
0.37
47.72%
7
617 (31.28%)
337
0.29
0.43
44.25%
7
636 (21.07%)
295
0.31
0.64
40.25%
7
41 (26.83%)
618
0.44
0.00
41.46%
7
181 (25.97%)
385
0.40
0.60
46.41%
7
109 (18.35%)
336
0.31
0.83
41.28%
6
274 (20.80%)
143
0.31
0.47
45.26%
6
968 (21.49%)
330
0.39
0.49
43.49%
6
291 (30.24%)
237
0.32
0.43
43.30%
6
200 (26.50%)
228
0.26
0.70
51.00%
6
112 (32.14%)
525
0.62
0.05
43.75%
6
293 (25.60%)
261
0.38
0.50
42.66%
6
42 (33.33%)
340
0.64
0.64
52.38%
6
104 (27.88%)
263
0.25
0.39
41.35%
5
31 (32.26%)
188
0.39
0.74
54.84%
5
932 (24.25%)
295
0.52
0.44
46.46%
5
206 (28.64%)
165
0.25
0.43
36.41%
5
145 (23.45%)
102
0.19
0.50
41.38%
5
1 (0.00%)
0
0.00
0.00
n/a
0.00%
5
423 (40.66%)
363
0.72
0.09
52.01%
5
327 (26.61%)
206
0.39
0.55
48.62%
5
149 (21.48%)
318
0.62
0.67
47.65%
5
619 (20.03%)
265
0.46
0.26
45.88%
5
491 (23.22%)
217
0.46
0.56
48.27%
4
64 (35.94%)
145
0.56
0.38
50.00%
4
76 (26.32%)
72
0.25
0.67
43.42%
4
27 (44.44%)
184
0.70
0.48
51.85%
4
529 (31.57%)
76
0.25
0.44
48.02%
4
176 (29.55%)
153
0.41
0.30
43.75%
4
619 (18.26%)
99
0.25
0.81
42.16%
4
729 (24.42%)
228
0.59
0.38
42.80%
4
81 (35.80%)
132
0.43
0.32
39.51%
4
45 (28.89%)
241
0.93
0.78
40.00%
4
602 (36.38%)
250
0.65
0.07
48.50%
4
17 (35.29%)
128
0.18
0.18
47.06%
4
64 (31.25%)
165
0.47
0.56
56.25%
3
3 (33.33%)
67
0.33
1.00
66.67%
3
272 (22.43%)
126
0.47
0.61
47.43%
3
114 (27.19%)
50
0.25
0.43
49.12%
3
25 (40.00%)
69
0.32
0.12
48.00%
3
6 (33.33%)
56
0.17
0.67
33.33%
3
117 (21.37%)
90
0.32
0.91
52.14%
3
193 (29.02%)
119
0.40
0.25
50.78%
3
110 (26.36%)
53
0.28
0.35
37.27%
3
13 (0.00%)
140
0.15
0.69
30.77%
3
10 (20.00%)
152
0.80
0.60
40.00%
3
370 (24.86%)
80
0.26
0.34
47.84%
3
28 (25.00%)
127
0.25
0.46
57.14%
3
169 (26.63%)
57
0.22
0.13
46.75%
2
1 (0.00%)
0
0.00
0.00
n/a
0.00%
2
77 (22.08%)
32
0.10
0.83
48.05%
2
13 (15.38%)
47
0.15
0.08
23.08%
2
9 (44.44%)
45
0.33
0.00
66.67%
2
15 (26.67%)
59
0.27
0.53
53.33%
2
2 (0.00%)
0
0.00
0.50
n/a
0.00%
2
55 (29.09%)
92
0.51
0.45
49.09%
2
26 (34.62%)
25
0.15
0.12
46.15%
2
2 (50.00%)
75
0.00
0.00
100.00%
2
4 (25.00%)
30
0.00
0.50
n/a
50.00%
2
22 (31.82%)
40
0.05
0.55
63.64%
2
28 (7.14%)
103
0.50
0.43
21.43%
2
5 (0.00%)
61
0.00
1.00
n/a
20.00%
2
158 (27.85%)
110
0.58
0.48
46.20%
2
107 (22.43%)
73
0.42
0.59
48.60%
2
17 (17.65%)
25
0.12
0.47
35.29%
2
12 (25.00%)
9
0.08
0.25
41.67%
2
16 (31.25%)
71
0.31
0.25
43.75%
1
2 (0.00%)
141
2.00
1.00
50.00%
1
11 (18.18%)
126
0.82
0.64
36.36%
1
10 (40.00%)
41
0.40
0.40
50.00%
1
26 (23.08%)
14
0.12
0.19
46.15%
1
5 (40.00%)
51
0.60
0.40
60.00%
1
10 (20.00%)
41
0.70
0.10
40.00%
1
7 (14.29%)
65
0.29
1.29
28.57%
Gold cost of prem vehicles: 10,305
USD Value: $41.22

Creadits spent on regular vhicles: 30,961,300
Credits to gold: 77,403

Total Gold: 87,708
Total USD: $350.83

1 gold = 400 credits | 250 gold =$1.00 USD
(This feature is in testing so might not be accurate)

Let us know if you would like to see your banner here.
This is not an official WG website.
Any information presented here might not be 100% accurate.